Gay and lesbian
couples find hope in Mass. ruling, challenges in
building families
David Peterson, Star
Tribune Published November 30, 2003
Smidzik, the family is
called.
Smidzik? What's that,
Croatian?
"No, it's a combination
of 'Smith' and 'Idzik," Laura Smidzik said. "I convinced
Linda to do it while Son No. 1 was in the womb. I said,
'Let's all have the same name. That is symbolic in our
society of a family, that you all have the same last
name."
Jessie and Stacie
WareJoncas simply taped their two last names together.
Now it's also the last name of their three kids.
As the landmark
Massachusetts court decision authorizing gay marriages
sends shock waves across the nation, gay and lesbian
couples by the thousands in Minnesota are forming
families with children and figuring out all sorts of new
ways to handle the resulting challenges, newly available
data from the 2000 U.S. Census reveals.
Just about all of them
seem to agree that all they'd really like to be is
married.
"People are very
excited about what happened in Massachusetts, but people
who have children are even more excited," said Deborah
Talen, executive director of Rainbow Families, an
organization serving Upper Midwest gays and lesbians
with kids.
"Right now we have to
stand on our heads to get the kinds of protections for
our kids that come automatically when a man and woman
marry," she said. "We're not building families as a
political statement. We do it for the same reasons
anyone else does: we want to watch children grow, we
want to have what we always considered to be a 'family,'
and when we do, our families are pretty much like anyone
else's. It's always a bit astounding to us that others
find us so threatening, because we think we're pretty
conservative."
Last week, conservative
Republicans in the U.S. Senate introduced a
constitutional amendment that would permanently bar gay
marriages. One had already been introduced in the House.
In Minnesota, some legislators have promised to push for
a similar amendment to the state Constitution when the
Legislature reconvenes in February. Minnesota law has
banned same-sex marriage since 1997.
The sheer number of
kids in gay and lesbian households in the region will
surprise some folks.
The Census 2000 found
that about 6,500 same-sex couples in the seven-county
Twin Cities area reported themselves as domestic
partners. Newly available analyses of the census are
finding that about 1,400 of those households include
children.
Many couples simply
bring children from previous marriages. Even today, the
majority of domestic partner relationships in Minnesota
include at least one previously married person. Nearly
20 percent reported that both partners were divorced
from spouses of the opposite sex.
Talen's surveys of her
members, which may not represent the wider population,
find that in such partnerships, 30 percent of children
are from divorce and another 30 percent are adopted. The
rest are born as part of the partnership.
"It used to be that
more woman than men intentionally started families,"
said Tim Reardon, of Golden Valley, whose daughter just
celebrated her first birthday. "Now a lot more men are
looking at the different options: adoption, either
domestic or international, or surrogacy," the latter
being the path that he and Eric Mann chose.
Reardon, now in his
40s, remembers a counselor in high school asking him
whether he wanted to be a father some day. "I said, 'Oh,
yeah, I'd love to be!' And he said, 'Well, you're
probably not gay.' And I said, 'No, I do want to be gay
and I do want to be a father.' I am so thrilled that
these days it's no big deal."
But the growth in
numbers also raises new questions for the families and
makes the question of marriage more urgent.
"We did have a
commitment ceremony and called it a wedding," said Laura
Smidzik, of St. Paul. "But when we go to a friend's
heterosexual wedding and see the judge show up with a
marriage certificate, we feel a huge knot because we
realize the implications that has for that family vs.
what we never had.
"We were legally savvy
and had wills and power of attorney and all these
documents to protect our relationship even before
children, but now with children the stress is so great.
I dropped to 15 hours a week to do the field trips and
dental visits and all the family things parents have to
do and yet we have all these questions."
Many of the questions
are financial and legal, she said.
"What if Linda dies? I
can't inherit her retirement. It would be a legal
quagmire with so much to tackle that automatically falls
into place if you're married," Laura Smidzik said. "I
think about kids going to college and what happens with
financial aid, about doctors' office forms and school
forms that have no language that includes us. Day to day
you're constantly trying to make yourself fit in to a
system that on so many levels doesn't acknowledge us."
Others share that
concern.
"Families can function
emotionally as valid families on their own," said
Abigail Garner, who runs the Web site "Families Like
Mine" (http://www.familieslikemine.com)
and will soon publish a book with the same title. "What
they need is legal protection. Often the legal issues
don't come up till emergencies arise, and suddenly you
are faced with the question of how, for instance, to get
access to someone in a hospital if you're not legally
recognized as 'kin'.
The kids, many agree,
have as tricky a time as any. In a lesbian relationship,
who's Mom?
"In our house,"
WareJoncas said, "it's 'Mommy' and 'Mama.' The generic
is 'Moms.' A cry of "Mom!" is generic and anyone can
respond."
Some of it is humorous,
some is more unsettling. If the child is not the same
sex as the partners, for instance, who will be his or
her role model?
"But so many kids live
with one parent due to divorce or death," Reardon said.
"We have a circle of friends with wonderful women in our
lives and a nanny who is there five days a week with a
wonderful bond. We have an amazing network of women who
have all talked about the fact that at those times in
Tess's life they will be there for her."
For the gay and lesbian
couples, the Massachusetts ruling comes as a thrilling
moment of recognition, though many worry about renewed
efforts to enforce marriage as only between a man and a
woman. For Laura Smidzik, in particular, it led to a
sweet moment with her father.
"He lives in
Massachusetts," she said, "and he called me and said,
'Come back East, Laura, it's going to happen any time
now!"