Surrogacy for Independent Intended Parents

Surrogate Mothers and Egg Donors

Intended Parents, Inc

Contact us

Home

FAQ

Surrogacy Support by Telephone

Surrogacy Book

Home

About Us

Recommended Reading

Blogs

More News Articles

Lawyers and Fertility Centers

 

Looking for a Surrogate Mother or an egg donor?

 

 

This book is a moving real-life account of one woman's struggle with infertility and her journey through surrogacy to have the family she desperately wanted.

Click here for more details

 

 

Latest Surrogacy News

 


Mother Treated her Baby as 'A Commodity'
By Wesley Johnson, PA News May 21, 2004
 
Moira Greenslade treated an innocent baby as “little more than a commodity, purely for financial gain”, police said today.

Detective Chief Inspector Mick Hopwood, of West Yorkshire Police’s child and public protection unit, said: “This is a very sad case.”

Greenslade, 33, from Keighley, West Yorks, offered to give up her child to two couples she contacted through a surrogacy website.

She was jailed for two years today at Leeds Crown Court after earlier pleading guilty to three charges of obtaining money by deception and three offences under the Adoption Act.

Mr Hopwood said: “People who were desperate for children were taken advantage of and an innocent baby, who had no choice in the matter, was treated as little more than a commodity, purely for financial gain.

“It is quite right that a jail sentence has been imposed.”

He said the activities of Moira Greenslade first came to light in late November 2003 when the Robinson-Hudson family contacted their local police and complained that despite handing over £1,500 to Moira Greenslade to adopt her unborn baby she had cancelled the agreement.

Officers started an investigation and found that she was due to have an elective caesarean birth at the Airedale General Hospital in West Yorkshire on December 2, 2003.

Mr Hopwood said the hospital had been told the intended parents were to be the Johnson family from Scotland and that they had chosen to be present at the birth.

The hospital authorities told police they were aware that Greenslade had the previous year given birth to a baby as a surrogate mother and there was nothing for them to suspect that the arrangement with the Johnson family was untoward.

Mr Hopwood said the Johnson family attended Airedale Hospital on December 2 but Greenslade failed to turn up.

Police officers spoke to the Johnson family and the details of their arrangement with Greenslade were taken. They had agreed to pay her £9,000 for expenses and had actually paid £4,000, Mr Hopwood said.

On that same date police officers executed a search warrant at Greenslade’s home address and recovered her computer. This was examined and revealed that Moira Greenslade had been making arrangements with the Robinson-Hudson family, the Johnson family and a family in Southampton called Rashley.

There was also evidence of families from America and elsewhere negotiating to adopt the baby, Mr Hopwood said.

Evidence from the computer led the police to believe that Greenslade had made firm arrangements to hand over the baby on birth to the Rashley family and following enquiries to trace her she was discovered to have attended the Southampton Princess Anne hospital for a caesarean birth.

The Rashley family were also present.

Working with colleagues from Social Services and Hampshire Police Child Protection Unit, West Yorkshire Police took steps to take the newly born child into protective care through the use of a Police Protection Order.

Greenslade was technically arrested and immediately bailed to appear back in West Yorkshire where she was later interviewed and charged with the offences for which she later appeared at Court.

Detective Chief Inspector Hopwood said today: “The enquiry was an unusual one and the legislation around this type of activity is weak.

“The offences associated with this act are summary only and officers and CPS finally and reluctantly agreed a range of charges within the Theft Act.

“Moira Greenslade herself co-operated fully with the investigation and provided an open account of her actions.

“Her explanation for committing the offences fell between a motivation to help childless couples and a personal motivation to make money.

“The circumstances of the previous surrogacy agreement made in 2002 do not give rise to any suggestion that this was an illegal arrangement and so far as the police and Social Services are concerned that matter is finalised.”

back to top

 
 

Privacy Statement     Terms and Conditions     Acceptable Use   Contact us

 

 

 

Copyright 2000 - 2007 (c)IntendedParents, Inc.   All rights reserved